As AI systems move beyond short, isolated tasks, one of the hardest challenges is long-term reasoning - the ability to plan, adapt, and pursue goals over extended time horizons. To probe this capability, leading AI labs have turned to an unexpected benchmark: Nintendo’s 1990s Pokémon games. What looks playful on the surface has become a serious testbed for evaluating how well modern AI agents can think, plan, and persist in complex environments.
Ten key points explaining why Pokémon matters for AI evaluation
-
Pokémon tests long-horizon planning, not just intelligence
Unlike standard benchmarks, Pokémon requires models to plan dozens of steps ahead - training characters, managing resources, navigating maps, and deciding when to fight or retreat. There is no single “correct” move. -
The game exposes weaknesses hidden by traditional benchmarks
Many benchmarks test static reasoning or short answers. Pokémon forces models to maintain context and strategy over hours or days of gameplay, revealing failures in memory, persistence, and goal alignment. -
Multiple AI labs are using the same game independently
Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google have all adopted Pokémon as a shared evaluation environment, making it a rare informal benchmark across competing AI ecosystems. -
Live Twitch streams turn evaluation into public experiments
AI models like Claude, GPT, and Gemini play Pokémon live on Twitch, with hundreds of thousands of viewers watching and commenting. This creates transparency into how models actually behave over time. -
Models must balance exploration vs optimization
The game forces strategic trade-offs: should the model train existing Pokémon or catch new ones? Grind levels or push ahead? These decisions resemble real-world agent trade-offs. -
Environment interaction matters as much as reasoning
Pokémon requires navigating menus, maps, and game mechanics. This tests not just “thinking,” but the ability to interact reliably with tools and environments - a core requirement for AI agents. -
GPT and Gemini have completed the original game
Both OpenAI’s GPT and Google’s Gemini models have successfully finished Pokémon Red/Blue, demonstrating sustained long-term planning capability. -
Claude Opus 4.5 is still attempting completion
Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.5, despite being strong at reasoning and coding, has not yet completed the full game - highlighting how hard long-term agency truly is. -
The real value is infrastructure learning, not game completion
According to Anthropic’s David Hershey, lessons from Pokémon directly improve how AI agents are deployed for customers - especially around memory, recovery from failure, and system robustness. -
Pokémon signals a shift toward “agent-first” evaluation
This approach reflects a broader industry shift: testing AI as autonomous agents operating over time, not just as chatbots answering isolated questions.
Summary
Pokémon has emerged as an unconventional but powerful benchmark for testing AI long-term reasoning, planning, and agency. By forcing models to pursue complex goals over extended periods, the game reveals strengths and limitations that traditional benchmarks miss. More importantly, it helps AI labs refine the infrastructure needed to deploy real-world AI agents safely and reliably. What began as a nostalgic game has become a serious proving ground for the next generation of intelligent systems.
[The Billion Hopes Research Team shares the latest AI updates for learning and awareness. Various sources are used. All copyrights acknowledged. This is not a professional, financial, personal or medical advice. Please consult domain experts before making decisions. Feedback welcome!]
