"If this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong. We want to work with the government to prevent that." - Sam Altman, CEO, OpenAI
Digital deception
Deepfakes are no longer rare aberrations, but fairly mainstream. From manipulated celebrity endorsements to fakes of political and financial leaders, synthetic media is becoming cheap and eerily convincing. Many Indian users have encountered these digital fabrications, pushing policymakers to act quickly to protect citizens from potential fraud and misinformation.
Platform liability debate
India's proposed amendments to the Intermediary Guidelines require platforms to label synthetic content permanently. This marks a significant departure from the existing safe harbour regime under Section 79 of the IT Act. Instead of being neutral, platforms may now be required to inspect and modify user content. This is onerous, tedious and potentially very risky.
Enforcement not straight
Implementing these strict rules poses massive technical challenges. Mandating visible watermarks is difficult to enforce across all online formats. Even advanced detection models struggle to identify deepfakes reliably. For smaller firms, compliance costs could be prohibitive and might lead to the accidental censorship of legitimate speech.
Global alternatives
Other nations are testing more calibrated approaches, realizing the folly in being rigid. The EU focuses on transparency without rigid rules, while the US targets specific harms like election interference. We should prioritize provenance tools that verify content at the point of creation rather than relying on platforms to act as content police.
Consumer concerns
An effective strategy must prioritize public awareness and digital literacy. We must preserve the openness of the digital commons while using reporting tools and provenance checks. This approach builds trust and ensures security without sacrificing the innovation that defines the digital growth of India.
Summary
The article argues that India's proposed deepfake regulations are overly restrictive and technically difficult to implement. By shifting liability to platforms and mandating visible labels, the rules may stifle innovation. Instead, a smarter approach focusing on content provenance and user literacy would better protect the digital ecosystem.
Food for thought
If platforms are forced to act as content police to avoid liability, will the internet lose its status as a space for free and neutral expression?
AI concept to learn: Content provenance
This refers to the digital record that tracks the origin and history of a piece of media. It allows users to verify where an image or video came from and whether it has been altered since its creation. Tools like digital watermarking and metadata help establish this trail of authenticity without relying on automated detection alone.
[The Billion Hopes Research Team shares the latest AI updates for learning and awareness. Various sources are used. All copyrights acknowledged. This is not a professional, financial, personal or medical advice. Please consult domain experts before making decisions. Feedback welcome!]
COMMENTS