“Artificial intelligence is not a magic wand; it’s a mirror reflecting the quality of our data, systems, and decisions.” – Demis Hassabis, CEO and Co-founder of DeepMind
The widening GenAI divide
Generative AI projects are now where CRM and ERP once were in the 1990s—brimming with promise but riddled with failure. According to MIT’s NANDA initiative, only 5 percent of AI deployments show rapid revenue acceleration, while the rest remain stuck in pilots or collapse altogether. The “GenAI divide” is not just real but growing wider.
The real culprit behind the hype
Contrary to popular belief, the problem isn’t immature technology or model hallucination. It’s flawed integration, poor governance, and overreliance on plug-in solutions. MIT’s research found that more than half of all AI budgets go to sales and marketing tools while ignoring back-office automation, where genuine transformation often begins.
When culture lags behind capability
Building in-house AI succeeds only a third as often as using tested, purchased tools. Companies that empower managers to embed AI into daily operations are far likelier to succeed. Yet, when firms scatter AI budgets without prioritization, impact remains shallow and skepticism grows.
Strategy before software
A buy-and-partner approach works better than a build-alone model, reducing risk and accelerating adoption. Treating AI as a patch for broken systems or as a research toy in labs kills momentum. The shift from isolated experiments to integrated transformation is key.
Managing people in the AI era
Human oversight and change management remain vital. Microsoft’s Copilot shows success by focusing on measurable ROI, employee satisfaction, and task efficiency. Technology alone can’t save an organization, culture and foresight will.

COMMENTS